As part of Peer Overview Week 2025, to point out our gratitude for the continuing help and repair of our reviewers to the journals, and the broader scientific group, we wish to prolong a heartfelt thanks to all peer reviewers. Reviewers serve a significant function in sustaining the excessive requirements of ACAMH’s journals, offering diligent and insightful suggestions to authors and serving as the inspiration of the manufacturing of fascinating, valued papers within the subject of kid and adolescent psychological well being, and past.
Given the theme of 2025’s Peer Overview Week: Rethinking Peer Overview within the AI Period, it is very important observe the growing significance of the function of reviewers in scholarly publishing. The sector is enduring a interval of confusion across the use/misuse of Massive Language Fashions (LLMs), considerations round papermills, and subsequent results on analysis integrity; it turns into all of the extra necessary to showcase the help now we have from a big group of reviewers. We at ACAMH are repeatedly humbled by the generosity, effectivity and experience of our reviewers.
We’re proud to current the record of Prime Reviewers for the 2024 calendar 12 months. The people included within the record beneath have been evaluated on the variety of evaluations they’ve carried out for the journal, in addition to for the standard and timeliness of their evaluations. Nonetheless, there are various extra reviewers that didn’t make this record, however however supplied evaluations of nice high quality, for which we’re extremely grateful. To this finish, from 2024 onwards we additionally publish a full record of our reviewers (see right here for the 2024 calendar 12 months) with 800+ beneficiant reviewers giving their time – We’re endlessly grateful for this rising group. We additionally wish to take this chance to thank our Affiliate Editors, who routinely present evaluations regardless of their different commitments to the journal.
JCPP Prime Reviewers
- David Goldston, Duke College Faculty of Medication, USA
- Diana Whalen, Washington College Faculty of Medication, USA
- Jonathan Schaefer, Vanderbilt College, USA
- Kaili Rimfeld, King’s Faculty London, UK
- Lars Mehlum, College of Oslo, Norway
- Maggie Snowling, College of Oxford, UK
- Martin Rimvall, Youngster and Adolescent Psychological Well being Heart, Psychological Well being Companies, Capital Area of Denmark, Denmark
- Tamsin Newlove-Delgado, College of Exeter, UK
- Tony Charman, King’s Faculty London, UK
- Delshad Shroff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State College, USA
CAMH Prime Reviewers
- Alessio Bellato, College of Southampton, UK
- Christopher Bellonci, Decide Baker Youngsters’s Heart, USA
- Claire Fraser, College of Manchester, UK
- Francis Vergunst, Université de Montréal, Canada
- Gail Tripp, Okinawa Institute of Science and Know-how Graduate College, Japan
- Handan Terzi, Ankara Medipol College, Türkiye
- Hülya Kulakçı Altıntaş, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit College, Türkiye
- Jane Lim, Center Tennessee State College, USA
- Ottar Ness, Norwegian College of Science and Know-how, Norway
- Tobias Banaschewski, Central Institute of Psychological Well being, Germany
JCPP Advances Prime Reviewers
- Alex Lloyd, College Faculty London, UK
- Bjorn Holte Hallstein, VID Specialised College, Norway
- Britt Morthorst, Area Hovedstadens Psykiatri, Denmark
- Dane Stickney, College of Colorado Denver, USA
- Ellen Verhoef, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Netherlands
- Hollie Homosexual, College of Exeter, UK
- Koraly Pérez-Edgar, The Pennsylvania State College, USA
- Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, College Faculty London, UK
- Mark Stein, College of Washington, USA
- Stephan Collishaw, Cardiff College, UK
Thanks once more to all our peer reviewers for his or her invaluable contributions to the continuing success of ACAMH’s journals. ACAMH needs to encourage any potential reviewers who’re pondering of becoming a member of the peer evaluation course of. All reviewers for ACAMH are acknowledged for his or her invaluable work via 5 accessible recognition schemes – See right here for extra particulars.
The Editorial Workplace is actively exploring a spectrum of concepts to additional showcase our appreciation for the important function that reviewers carry out, together with the upcoming creation of JCPP, CAMH and JCPP Advances Early Profession Researcher (ECR) Panels, to highlight, formalise and supply a platform for ECR contributions to see evaluation. If you’re an early profession researcher, we’d love to listen to from you.
For these much less acquainted with the method, check out our basic recommendation to reviewers beneath:
- be truthful – the method depends in your experience so attempt to be goal and well timed
- be open – in case you are unable to just accept a request on account of different commitments, lack of understanding, or a battle of curiosity – it’s all the time higher to say than delay the method
- be constructive – once you establish issues with the paper, attempt to counsel how they are often addressed
- take into account context – a great evaluation examines each the scientific rigour of the paper and what it contributes to the sector as an entire
We’d additionally wish to take this time to encourage any reviewers who’re pondering of becoming a member of the peer evaluation course of. If you’re desirous about reviewing papers for any of ACAMH’s journals, please get in contact with the Publications Group.
