After I began my PhD research, earlier than the Covid pandemic, I’d get requested why I used to be how peer supporters use digital applied sciences. Again then, as I later heard from a few of my contributors, peer supporters had been struggling to be accepted, the NHS relied on paper and outdated applied sciences, and voluntary sector organisations noticed face-to-face conversations as the center of their provide. Why would I select this matter? However how instances have modified.
Peer supporters at the moment are established throughout the psychological well being workforce throughout England (NHSE, 2020) and a current systematic umbrella overview of peer help, beforehand featured in these woodlands, has described its effectiveness in addition to obstacles and enablers to implementation (Cooper et al, 2024). In relation to digital, the newest NHS 10-year plan guarantees a shift from analogue to digital, “from bricks to clicks” (NHS, 2025).
However with the fast pace of developments related to digital, I query how this shift may really feel from a lived expertise perspective, and if psychological well being care dangers substituting a medical mannequin with a digital mannequin. So, I used to be to take a look at a current overview from Yeo and colleagues which mixes the 2 subjects of digital and peer help.
What does a shift ‘from bricks to clicks’ imply for peer help staff?
Strategies
The authors of this overview searched tutorial databases for trials of digital peer help to deal with questions concerning the results of: totally different sources of the peer help together with casual and formal; options of digital peer help corresponding to dosage and platforms; and components associated to people and international locations. They had been particularly within the impacts on wholesome folks, for both psychological well being or bodily well being.
They narrowed their search down from over 60,000 distinctive data to 120 research after which turned to analyse the quantitative knowledge. Their meta-analysis mixed the outcomes throughout the research to measure the impacts that addressed their questions.
How will we join digitally with different folks in peer help?
Outcomes
The outcomes counsel that digital peer help had stronger constructive results on psychological well being than on bodily well being, and that digital interventions which embody casual, naturally occurring peer help could also be simpler than extra formal choices for wholesome folks. Effectiveness appeared to lower with longer durations, with strategies that this could be as a result of “prolonged durations of intervention end in detrimental interactions with friends” (p.6). For each bodily and psychological well being, extra interactive platforms had been simpler: apps, social networks and video conferencing had been simpler than boards and dialogue boards, web sites and others (emails, texts and cellphone).
The affect of digital peer help was not affected by the age of the contributors, and the impact didn’t scale back with growing severity of present bodily or psychological well being circumstances. As a result of there weren’t sufficient research to check particular person international locations, the authors in contrast Western (e.g. Australia, Canada, Germany, United States) and Japanese (e.g. China, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan) international locations. Digital peer help interventions had better results on growing psychological well being in Japanese international locations, and on enhancing bodily well being in Western international locations.
Three limitations had been recognized: that the research within the overview mixed peer help with totally different therapy parts; that different doubtlessly vital moderators (corresponding to particular settings) weren’t thought of; and that the included research had been primarily Western and didn’t report on ethnicity.
Conclusion
The authors conclude that their research:
advances understanding of efficient digital peer help for wholesome populations past earlier critiques and meta-analyses that centered on people already recognized with scientific circumstances (p.7).
How will we outline ‘digital peer help’?
Strengths and limitations
I’ve a long-standing frustration concerning the lack of a definition of ‘digital peer help’ – it isn’t confined to this overview. An early commentary about peer help in digital psychiatry urged that peer help is more and more supplied in synchronous and asynchronous applied sciences and “artificially by way of avatars and chatbots” (Venegas et al., 2019, p.222). A later systematic overview outlined digital peer help as “stay or automated companies delivered by way of expertise media” (Fortuna et al., 2020, p.2). Except for essentially questioning the peer-ness of synthetic or automated help, after I searched the literature for my PhD, I concluded that the majority research had been , what I generously time period, peer-supported digital interventions. This implies the main focus of the researchers was on creating digital interventions, and so they concerned folks with lived expertise to help different folks to make use of them. Their publications gave particulars concerning the digital interventions, however not often described how, or if, lived experience was utilized in help, or questioned the expertise required to be thought of a peer. This didn’t really feel true to look help values and rules.
Inside this present overview, I used to be confused by the inclusion of a number of the main research. For instance, I had by no means understood the Enrich research (Gillard et al, 2022) as being about digital peer help. Their peer help intervention included an possibility of cellphone calls, nevertheless it didn’t really feel central to their research. One other instance was a research concerning the affect of peer help coaching delivered on-line in June 2020 throughout the preliminary pandemic precautions (Pavarini et al, 2023). The first outcomes had been associated to the flexibility to supply help, and secondary outcomes had been associated to wellbeing, however outcomes had been associated to receiving coaching not peer help. A 3rd instance was a research of an interactive story-telling app with no human interplay (O’Dea et al, 2020), the place the phrase peer was solely talked about as a problem for younger folks, in phrases like “peer victimisation” (p.899) and “peer battle” (p.902). These are only a few examples of a broad and unhelpful lack of specificity about what constitutes digital peer help.
I used to be additionally confused about definitions associated to wholesome folks and folks with scientific circumstances within the preliminary search. The overview supposed to check if digital peer help could be simpler for wholesome folks, so I might admire the necessity for a comparability with individuals who weren’t wholesome. However an exclusion within the search phrases of “people with scientific circumstances” led to me questioning the inclusion of research the place contributors had been clearly at present or not too long ago utilizing companies corresponding to inpatient psychiatric companies and most cancers companies. Definitions and an evidence are vital to know the populations who may profit from digital peer help.
One other concern concerning the search was the shortage of clear boundaries for publication date. Searches had been performed in December 2023 and Might 2024, however twenty-three of the psychological well being research had been from earlier than 2014, together with one from 1990. Digital platforms, the implementation of peer help, and, to some extent, our views on psychological well being, have all modified lately, in order that the research had been throughout totally different contexts. I query if they might all be thought of related to right this moment’s apply.
All these questions (and extra) left me with severe doubts about this research and what it’d add to present apply and understanding. I acknowledge that a few of my doubts might stem from cultural variations for a global research, and that the language and understandings of peer help itself may range throughout international locations (for instance, see Ma, 2025).
With out a clear and agreed definition of digital peer help, it isn’t potential to conclude from this overview what options of the digital interventions may make them efficient.
Lived expertise involvement
Peer help is essentially about lived expertise: about folks of equal standing offering help to one another (Mead et al., 2001). In relation to psychological well being, peer help has an extended, activist historical past with roots in consumer teams and mutual support. It’s only not too long ago that companies are adopting it by using paid peer help staff or recognising the worth of the mutual support we would present informally to one another, together with in on-line boards. However as companies, and researchers, transfer into our areas, there’s a threat that the essence of peer help is misplaced, diluted into simply one other intervention.
There was no assertion of positionality inside this overview to counsel if any of the workforce had been working from a lived expertise perspective. Admittedly, the researchers might not have needed to reveal their very own experiences (Baldawi et al, 2025). Nonetheless, if peer help is about lived expertise, then we should be seen and central to research about it, not simply as contributors, however as energetic researchers, advisors, and as a part of the peer overview groups for funders and journals. Gillard (2019) factors to the necessity to assume once more concerning the affect of analysis strategies on the event of peer help, and there may be printed recommendation for journal editors and reviewers with helpful inquiries to be requested about participation (Colder Carras et al, 2022).
All in, there isn’t a cause for journals to publish research about peer help that aren’t specific about together with a lived expertise perspective.
There are sufficient considerations concerning the professionalisation of peer help because it will get absorbed into programs with out the misappropriation of the phrase right into a digital mannequin. Shifting forwards, as we’re pushed ‘from bricks to clicks’ and builders rush in, all of us have a accountability to make sure that the novel roots of peer help aren’t misplaced within the course of.
Is ‘digital peer help’ being outlined with out involving us?
Implications for apply
With my curiosity in digital and peer help, I’ve grow to be more and more alarmed on the potential for a digital mannequin to trigger important harms. With tales together with the excessive profile and rising considerations round 7 cups, the Nationwide Consuming Problems Affiliation’s elimination of its chatbot, Tessa, and fears over harms from ChatGPT with its stigma and sycophancy, I’m cautious of a tradition of digital options which deal with competitors and monetary pursuits versus public profit and social justice.
This overview affords little to reassure or to affect apply. It’s the unstated gaps which can be vital. We don’t know what kind of peer help, formal or casual, digital or in individual, may work for various circumstances, international locations, well being circumstances and demographic traits. There may be unlikely to be one answer for all, and there are lots of gaps to curiosity researchers.
However first, maybe we have to “ask what sort of future we need to create, collectively” (Bender & Hanna, 2025, p. 196). Peer help is essentially not about bricks or clicks, however about folks, particularly folks with lived experience. We would need to use digital platforms, or we would not. However we should always actually be concerned in questioning and creating our future selections.
What sort of future are we creating, collectively?
Assertion of pursuits
I’m a co-director of each With-you Consultancy Ltd, which gives coaching and consultancy associated to look help, and the Survivor Researcher Community CIC, which gives help for researchers working from a lived expertise perspective. I additionally work freelance for varied Universities and organisations. The views expressed on this weblog are private and don’t characterize the views of any organisation I’m linked with.
I used to be a co-author on two papers which I’ve cited: these led by Cooper and by Colder Carras.
My PhD thesis is titled ‘Navigating the digital world: a grounded principle research of the usage of digital applied sciences by peer supporters’.
Hyperlinks
Major paper
Yeo, G., Fortuna, Okay. L., Lansford, J. E., & Rudolph, Okay. D. (2025). The results of digital peer help interventions on bodily and psychological well being: A overview and meta-analysis. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 34, e9.
Different references
Baidawi, S., Avery, S., Ball, R., & Newitt, R. (2025). Dwelling with Expertise within the Academy: Pressures to Disclose in Routine Analysis Actions. Australian Social Work, 78(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2023.2237490
Bender, E.M. & Hanna, A. (2025) The AI Con. Penguin Random Home
Colder Carras, M., Machin, Okay., Brown, M., Marttinen, T.-L., Maxwell, C., Frampton, B., Jackman, M., & Jones, N. (2022). Strengthening Evaluation and Publication of Participatory Psychological Well being Analysis to Promote Empowerment and Forestall Co-optation. Psychiatric Companies, appi.ps.20220085. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20220085
Cooper, R. E., Saunders, Okay. R. Okay., Greenburgh, A., Shah, P., Appleton, R., Machin, Okay., Jeynes, T., Barnett, P., Allan, S. M., Griffiths, J., Stuart, R., Mitchell, L., Chipp, B., Jeffreys, S., Lloyd-Evans, B., Simpson, A., & Johnson, S. (2024). The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer help approaches for psychological well being: A scientific umbrella overview. BMC Medication, 22(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03260-y
Gillard, S. (2019). Peer help in psychological well being companies: The place is the analysis taking us, and will we need to go there? Journal of Psychological Well being, 28(4), 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1608935
Gillard, S., Bremner, S., Patel, A., Goldsmith, L., Marks, J., Foster, R., Morshead, R., White, S., Gibson, S. L., Healey, A., Lucock, M., Patel, S., Repper, J., Rinaldi, M., Simpson, A., Ussher, M., Worner, J., & Priebe, S. (2022). Peer help for discharge from inpatient psychological well being care versus care as typical in England (ENRICH): A parallel, two-group, individually randomised managed trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00398-9
Ma, Z. (2025). Survivors, customers, or friends? Translating identities and decolonizing psychological well being in China. Transcultural Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615251359756
Mead, S., Hilton, D., & Curtis, L. (2001). Peer help: A theoretical perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25(2), 134–141.
NHS. (2025). Match for the long run: 10 12 months well being plan for England. https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-term-plan/
NHSE. (2020) Workforce, coaching and schooling: Peer help staff. https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/mental-health/new-roles-mental-health/peer-support-workers
O’Dea, B., Han, J., Batterham, P. J., Achilles, M. R., Calear, A. L., Werner-Seidler, A., Parker, B., Shand, F., & Christensen, H. (2020). A randomised managed trial of a relationship-focussed cell phone software for enhancing adolescents’ psychological well being. Journal of Youngster Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(8), 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13294
Pavarini, G., Reardon, T., Hollowell, A., Bennett, V., Lawrance, E., Brooks-Corridor, E., Foster-Estwick, A., Juma, D. O., Lewis, P., Energy, L., Rogers, M., Pinfold, V., Singh, I., & Peer Assist Younger Individuals’s Advisory Group. (2023). On-line peer help coaching to advertise adolescents’ emotional help expertise, psychological well being and company throughout COVID-19: Randomised managed trial and qualitative analysis. European Youngster & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(6), 1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01933-0
