Following Peer Evaluate Week 2024, to point out our gratitude for the continuing assist and repair of our reviewers to the journals, and the broader scientific neighborhood, we wish to lengthen a heartfelt thanks to all peer reviewers. Reviewers serve an important position in sustaining the excessive requirements of ACAMH’s journals, offering diligent and insightful suggestions to authors and serving as the muse of the manufacturing of fascinating, valued papers within the area of kid and adolescent psychological well being, and past. The sphere of scholarly publishing is enduring a interval of confusion across the use/misuse of Giant Language Fashions (LLMs), issues round papermills, and subsequent results on analysis integrity; it turns into all of the extra vital to showcase the assist we have now from a big neighborhood of reviewers. We at ACAMH are repeatedly humbled by the generosity, effectivity and experience of our reviewers.
We’re proud to current the record of prime reviewers for the 2023 calendar yr. The people included within the record beneath have been evaluated on the variety of evaluations they’ve carried out for the journal, in addition to for the standard and timeliness of their evaluations. Nonetheless, there are lots of extra reviewers that didn’t make this record, however nonetheless offered evaluations of nice high quality, for which we’re extremely grateful. To this finish, we may even be publishing a full record of our reviewers for the 2023 calendar yr.
JCPP High Reviewers
- Jessica Agnew-Blais, Queen Mary College of London, UK
- Tycho Dekkers, College of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Thomas Frazier, John Carroll College, USA
- BE Gibb, Binghamton College, USA
- Kirsten Gilbert, Washington College, USA
- Adam Guastella, College of Sydney, Australia
- David Hawes, College of Sydney, Australia
- Laura Hull, College of Bristol, UK
- Kasia Kostyrka-Allchorne, King’s School London, UK
- Benjamin Lahey, College of Chicago, USA
- Meng-Chuan Lai, College of Toronto, Canada
- Patty Leijten, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Barbara Maughan, Kings School London, UK
- Meeyoung Min, College of Utah, USA
- Aja Murray, College of Edinburgh, UK
- Tamsin Newlove-Delgado, Exeter College, UK
- Lori Scott, College of Pittsburgh, USA
- Gail Tripp, Okinawa Institute of Science and Expertise, Japan
- Pablo Vidal-Ribas, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Spain
- Alecia Vogel-Hammen, Washington College, USA
- Mark Wade, Boston Youngsters’s Hospital, USA
- Nicholas Wagner, Boston College, USA
- Jasmin Wertz, College of Edinburgh, UK
- Dieter Wolke, College of Warwick, UK
- Lucas Zullo, UCLA, USA
CAMH High Reviewers
- Opeyemi Atanda, London South Financial institution College, UK
- Mashudat Bello-Mojeed, Federal Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital, Nigeria
- Michael Bloch, Yale College, USA
- Camilla Cadorin, College of Verona, Italy
- Kunjie Cui, Southwestern College of Finance and Economics, China
- Naoufel Gaddour, College of Monastir, Tunisia
- David Hawes, College of Sydney, Australia
- Philip Kerrigan, College of York, UK
- Michael Kölch, Rostock College, Germany
- Marinos Kyriakopoulos, College of Athens, Greece
- Maria Lodes, College of Bristol, UK
- Marina Miscioscia, College of Padua, Italy
- Liesl Nydegger, Johns Hopkins College, USA
- Tasuku Okui, Kyushu College Hospital, Japan
- Antonio Piolanti, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria
- Eleonora Prina, College of Verona, Italy
- Ronald Rapee, Macquarie College, Australia
- Tessa Reardon, Oxford College, UK
- Katie Russell, College of Central Florida, USA
- Cinto Segalàs, Bellvitge College Hospital, Spain
- Marcin Sekowski, Maria Grzegorzewska Academy, Poland
- Emma Soneson, College of Cambridge, UK
- Tilman Steinert, Ulm College, Germany
- Andrea Wiglesworth, College of Minnesota, USA
- Simona Zaami, College of Rome La Sapienza, Italy
JCPP Advances High Reviewers
- Jessica Armitage, Cardiff College, UK
- Stephen Becker, Cincinnati Youngsters’s Hospital Medical Middle, USA
- Dorret Boomsma, College of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Virginia Carter Leno, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, UK
- Jessica Cohen, The College of North Carolina, USA
- Yun-Ju Chen, McMaster College, Canada
- Tycho Dekkers, College of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Luis C. Farhat, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
- Felix Fischer, Charite Medical College, Berlin
- Leonard Frach, College School London, UK
- Meredith Han, King’s School London, UK
- Stephen Kanne, Weill Cornell Drugs Psychology, USA
- Ralf Kuja-Halkola, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
- Michiel Luijten, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, The Netherlands
- Tom McAdams, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, UK
- Dana Charles McCoy, Harvard College, USA
- Merritt Millman, King’s School London, UK
- Meghan Miller, UC Davis MIND Institute, USA
- Espen Moen Eilertsen, College of Oslo, Norway
- Erik Pettersson, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
- Kathleen M. Roche, George Washington College, USA
- Susanne R de Rooij, College of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Keri Rosch, Kennedy Krieger Institute, USA
- Eivind Ystrom, College of Oslo, Norway
- Yanli Zhang-James, SUNY Upstate Medical College, USA
Thanks once more to all our peer reviewers for his or her invaluable contributions to the continuing success of ACAMH’s journals. ACAMH needs to encourage any potential reviewers who’re pondering of becoming a member of the peer evaluate course of. Our reviewers even have the chance to obtain recognition for his or her evaluate contributions on Internet of Science Reviewer Recognition Companies (previously Publons), permitting you to trace, confirm and showcase your evaluate work and experience with out compromising anonymity (Learn extra right here). The Editorial Workplace is actively exploring a spectrum of concepts to additional showcase our appreciation for the important position that reviewers carry out.
For these much less conversant in the method, check out our normal recommendation to reviewers beneath:
- be truthful – the method depends in your experience so attempt to be goal and well timed
- be open – in case you are unable to just accept a request because of different commitments, lack of information, or a battle of curiosity – it’s all the time higher to say than delay the method
- be constructive – once you determine issues with the paper, attempt to counsel how they are often addressed
- contemplate context – a superb evaluate examines each the scientific rigour of the paper and what it contributes to the sphere as an entire
We might additionally wish to take this time to encourage any reviewers who’re pondering of becoming a member of the peer evaluate course of. If you’re an early profession researcher, we’d love to listen to from you. If you’re taken with reviewing papers for any of ACAMH’s journals, please get in contact with the Publications Crew.
